Thursday, July 30 2026 14:52
Marianna Mkrtchyan

Dual Belarusian-Russian investor serves notice of dispute against Armenia over expropriation of Tsarukyan`s enterprises

Dual Belarusian-Russian investor serves notice of dispute against  Armenia  over expropriation of Tsarukyan`s enterprises

ArmInfo. Mikolai Vinitsky, a dual Belarusian-Russian investor, has announced that, on  27 July 2026, he served a Notice of Intent to Submit Claims to  Arbitration on the Republic of Armenia, formally notifying the  Government of Armenia of an investment dispute arising under three  investment protection treaties.  The investor's statement was  published by Iveta Tonoyan, press secretary of Gagik Tsarukyan's  Prosperous Armenia Party, on  her Facebook page.

The statement notes that the dispute arose due to the violation of  the Areement between the Government of Belarus and the Government of  Armenia on the Promotion and Mutual Protection of Investments of 26  May, 2001; The Agreement between the Governments of the Russian  Federation and Armenia on the Promotion and Mutual Protection of  Investments of 15September, 2001; and the Treaty on the Eurasian  Economic Union.

"The claim is expected to be one of the first investment treaty  disputes to invoke the investment protection provisions of the Treaty  on the Eurasian Economic Union against the Republic of Armenia,  potentially setting an important precedent for investors across the  Eurasian Economic Union. On 29 July 2026, the Government of Armenia  formally acknowledged receipt of the Notice."

It is noted that the dispute concerns Mr. Vinitsky's investments in,  and  economic interests associated with, four Armenian enterprises:  ARARATCEMENT CJSC, MULTI GROUP CONCERN LLC, MULTI WELLNESS CENTER  LLC, and YEREVAN ARARAT BRANDY-WINE-VODKA FACTORY OJSC.

 "The case concerns that the Government of Armenia has engaged in a  continuing course of conduct that began in the run-up to, and has  continued in the aftermath of, the June 2026 parliamentary elections,  offensively expropriating the investor's investments, failing to  afford them the protection required under international law, and  substantially impairing the management, operation and enjoyment of  those investments through unreasonable, arbitrary and discriminatory  measures adopted for political purposes.

The case further concerns concerns that, over an extended period, law  enforcement authorities, the judiciary and municipal authorities have  acted in a coordinated manner, under the direction of the highest  levels of the executive branch, to effect the takeover of the  Enterprises. The main shareholder of the Enterprises, Mr.  Gagik  Tsarukyan, who is also Mr. Vinitski's business partner, together with  members of the Enterprises' management, were arrested, while measures  taken by the authorities allegedly paralysed the operations of the  Enterprises, which rank among Armenia's largest employers and  taxpayers.

The investor has requested that the Government of Armenia refrain  from taking any further measures that would expropriate the  Enterprises or otherwise impair Mr. Vinitski's rights and economic  interests. He has further requested that the Government of Armenia  restore the status quo ante by, among other things, returning the  management and control of the Enterprises to their lawful  shareholders and management bodies, refraining from implementing the  announced nationalization measures, and allowing the Enterprises to  resume their ordinary business operations without governmental or  political interference.

The Notice invites the Republic of Armenia to resolve the dispute  amicably through negotiations. It also records the investor's  acceptance of Armenia's standing consent to arbitration under each of  the three applicable international instruments.

If the dispute cannot be resolved amicably through negotiations, Mr.  Vinitski intends to commence international investment arbitration  seeking full compensation for the losses resulting from the  Government of Armenia's breaches of its obligations under the  applicable investment treaties and the Treaty on the Eurasian  Economic Union," the statement reads.